Deep in the Nebraska wheat fields lies a gory, little tax-payer funded a factory farm called the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. What goes on behind these doors would make even the most avid enthusiasts of slasher movies sick to their stomachs. Incredibly cruel experimentation is conducted on livestock that includes cows, sheep, and pigs, all in an effort to maximize meat production for the dinner table. To put this another way, the United States has already legalized cruelty to animals as long as the cruelty keeps meat prices lower and the cruelty is government regulated.
Stories like this have been in the news before, but never of this magnitude. 60 Minutes should really conduct an investigative report on this place. They could show footage where scientists regularly submit livestock to cramped and crowded living quarters, harsh and horrific health conditions, and experimental processes that are designed to increase the levels of meat production while simultaneously decreasing the amount of bones. Animals are killed by inhumane trapping mechanisms, exploding poison-filled caps, and a series of other ghoulish processes that would make our blood curdle. Show this on TV, and the American Public would be outraged overnight.
Why are we allowing this to happen?
When faced with the problem of “animals as a sentient beings” vs. “escalating world hunger”, it is easy to see why politicians choose the latter as the more critical issue. But why can’t we solve both issues? Why does it have to be an “either/or” situation? Surely our technology has advanced far enough along that we no longer need to inflict cruel and inhumane treatment on any member of the animal kingdom simple to put food on the table. But, as one scientist recently interviewed by the New York Times recently put it, “It’s not a perfect world. We are trying to feed a population (that will soon reach) nine billion by 2050.”
Meat Consumption and Global Warming
Meat consumption and global warming are two issues that most of us would assume have no direct connection to one another whatsoever. But a recent study by Chatham House released in December of 2014 demonstrates that meat production is the single, largest contributor to the release of greenhouse gases that leads to global warming. Of course, politicians are also in disagreement as to whether or not global warming even exists.
So, it comes as no surprise that this argument carries very little weight with state and federal lawmakers. The American Public needs to become more involved in the oversight and accountability of our wildlife services. We must force our politicians to reject animal cruelty while using other methods of alternative research to solve the world’s hunger problems and issues of climate change. We can solve both issues, but only if we demand change.